Venezuela: Recent Headlines Reveal US Hypocrisy + Dreams of Regime Change

Steve Lalla

BY STEVE LALLA

Whereas the US political process has demonstrated all the solemnity of a Hollywood reality show, bona fide elections continue to take place in other nations, where elected leaders try to steer their countries through the morass of an American empire in decline.

“Trump did more for the liberation of humanity from Western imperialism, because of his crudeness than any other US leader in history,” commented political analyst Laith Marouf. “The latest example was him calling the US elections a fraud. With that, he made it impossible to undermine the elections in Venezuela.”

Within the US, Trump and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have employed tactics that US-backed politicians have been using on foreign soil for decades: attacking democratic processes, refusing to leave office, exhorting gangs of armed supporters, and crying fraud. Meanwhile, US media, who revel in polarizing opinion, have fanned the flames, exposing Trump and his comic entourage’s gaffes for the world. In the process, they’ve taken the steam out of their attacks on Venezuela’s democratic process. What is the mainstream media shouting about Venezuela, you might ask? Here are the headlines:

  • “U.S.’ Pompeo says Venezuelan elections were ‘political farce,’” read an ironic Reuters article on December 7. 
  • “US Condemns Venezuela Election as ‘Charade,’” reported Voice of America weakly the same day. 
  • “Venezuela’s Guide to Election Theft,” wrote the Wall Street Journal on November 29, eight days before the elections had even happened. 
  • “Venezuela’s Election Facade Helps Push Juan Guaido Offstage,” wrote Bloomberg on December 7, referring to Venezuela’s parliamentary elections as “stage-managed.” 

Like Trump in the US, these outlets were unable to provide any substantiation to fraud allegations, outside of the opinion of a handful of opposition members boycotting the election. Over 90 opposition parties did participate in Venezuela’s parliamentary elections on December 6, won handily by the PSUV/GPP alliance formed in 2012 by Hugo Chávez. Some honorary mentions from the hitlist:

  • “Venezuelans vote amid allegations of fraud against Nicolas Maduro,” reported Canada’s CBC on December 6, implying that Maduro’s position as head of state was being contested. 
  • “Venezuela’s Maduro claims victory in boycotted election,” CBC reported the next day, alongside a photo of a jubilant Maduro, repeating the inaccurate claim. The Canada-led Lima Group, an unaccredited coalition of a dozen or so ever-shifting nations including such bastions of democracy as Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Paraguay, and Peru, is committed to overthrowing Maduro.

Much to the ire of the U.S. propaganda machine, Venezuela’s elections unfolded without any protests or disturbances. No armed militias descending on voting centers as we saw in Nevada and Arizona, no gun-toting protestors arriving at politicians’ houses like in Michigan demanding an end to vote counting. 

No, what happened in Venezuela would be a sight for sore eyes in the “world’s greatest democracy.” Over 200 international observers, including the Latin American Council of Electoral Experts (CEELA) and former heads of state of Spain, Ecuador and Bolivia, attended Venezuela’s elections with no reported abnormalities. The most dramatic news was that President Maduro changed his voting center at the last minute for security reasons—not far-fetched considering the US placed a $15 million bounty on Maduro’s life and foiled plans to assassinate him were revealed last year.

Venezuelans have gone to the polls 26 times in presidential, constitutional, and parliamentary elections since Hugo Chávez’ first election in 1998. The US did recognize the results of the 2007 constitutional referendum, and the 2015 parliamentary election—the only two times that Chavistas were defeated electorally.

“This year, however, there is another layer of hypocrisy at play,” wrote Peter Bolton. “Because at the very same time as the US is denouncing an alleged breakdown in democracy in Venezuela as part of a transparent coup strategy, the current administration in Washington is attempting to undermine the result of its country’s presidential election.”

Nor did former reality-show host Trump help his case when a member of his legal team claimed in late November that Chávez and a cabal of communists had, from beyond the grave, rigged the recent US election. The ridiculous claims were repeated widely by mainstream media and received with great abandon on social media networks.

Media pundits also tried to imply low voter turnout in Venezuela was an indication of the decline of Chavista support. Unfortunately, Romania held parliamentary elections on the very same day as Venezuela and recorded a lower voter turnout. Similarly, turnout hit a record low in Jordan’s parliamentary elections held earlier in November. Fear of the pandemic played an obvious role in all cases. In Venezuela’s 2005 parliamentary elections, voter turnout was only 25 percent. US congressional elections normally draw about 40 percent of voters to the polls.

Western media also tried to exaggerate the division between Venezuelans: ”Legislative elections leave Venezuela in a political standoff,” reported ABC on December 7. Deliberately misleading readers and reporting the opposite of actual results that won Chavistas a strong majority in Venezuela’s assembly for the first time in five years. This majority will allow the ruling PSUV/GPP party to pass laws effectively, overcoming the impasse in parliament, which has been held in contempt since 2015.

The reality is that because of the widespread harm done to everyday Venezuelans by the US policy of economic warfare, encouraged by Juan Guaidó and the most virulent of Venezuela’s opposition, their coalition lost all the support that they once had among voters. Guaidó and the G4 coalition of political parties don’t represent all the opposition—far from it—but they’re the most outspoken in their support of unilateral sanctions, blockades, and US military intervention. Besides, Guaidó and his entourage appropriated billions of dollars in Venezuelan assets, surely not helping to endear voters to their cause.

US hybrid warfare on Venezuela consists of economic, military, and media attacks. Mainstream media’s eagerness to draw attention to Trump’s failings in his waning days accentuated the deep schisms in the collapsing hegemony of the US empire. 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: